Next: Portability, Previous: Compression, Up: Formats
(This message will disappear, once this node revised.)
When tar reads files, it updates their access times. To avoid this, use the --atime-preserve[=METHOD] option, which can either reset the access time retroactively or avoid changing it in the first place.
--atime-preserve=replace works on most systems, but it also restores the data modification time and updates the status change time. Hence it doesn't interact with incremental dumps nicely (see Incremental Dumps), and it can set access or data modification times incorrectly if other programs access the file while tar is running.
--atime-preserve=system avoids changing the access time in the first place, if the operating system supports this. Unfortunately, this may or may not work on any given operating system or file system. If tar knows for sure it won't work, it complains right away.
Currently --atime-preserve with no operand defaults to --atime-preserve=replace, but this is intended to change to --atime-preserve=system when the latter is better-supported.
When this option is used, tar leaves the data modification times of the files it extracts as the times when the files were extracted, instead of setting it to the times recorded in the archive.
This option is meaningless with --list (-t).
This is the default behavior for the superuser,
so this option is meaningful only for non-root users, when tar
is executed on those systems able to give files away. This is
considered as a security flaw by many people, at least because it
makes quite difficult to correctly account users for the disk space
they occupy. Also, the suid
or sgid
attributes of
files are easily and silently lost when files are given away.
When writing an archive, tar writes the user id and user name separately. If it can't find a user name (because the user id is not in /etc/passwd), then it does not write one. When restoring, it tries to look the name (if one was written) up in /etc/passwd. If it fails, then it uses the user id stored in the archive instead.
This is useful in certain circumstances, when restoring a backup from an emergency floppy with different passwd/group files for example. It is otherwise impossible to extract files with the right ownerships if the password file in use during the extraction does not match the one belonging to the file system(s) being extracted. This occurs, for example, if you are restoring your files after a major crash and had booted from an emergency floppy with no password file or put your disk into another machine to do the restore.
The numeric ids are always saved into tar archives. The identifying names are added at create time when provided by the system, unless --old-archive (-o) is used. Numeric ids could be used when moving archives between a collection of machines using a centralized management for attribution of numeric ids to users and groups. This is often made through using the NIS capabilities.
When making a tar file for distribution to other sites, it is sometimes cleaner to use a single owner for all files in the distribution, and nicer to specify the write permission bits of the files as stored in the archive independently of their actual value on the file system. The way to prepare a clean distribution is usually to have some Makefile rule creating a directory, copying all needed files in that directory, then setting ownership and permissions as wanted (there are a lot of possible schemes), and only then making a tar archive out of this directory, before cleaning everything out. Of course, we could add a lot of options to GNU tar for fine tuning permissions and ownership. This is not the good way, I think. GNU tar is already crowded with options and moreover, the approach just explained gives you a great deal of control already.
This option causes tar to set the modes (access permissions) of
extracted files exactly as recorded in the archive. If this option
is not used, the current umask
setting limits the permissions
on extracted files. This option is by default enabled when
tar is executed by a superuser.
This option is meaningless with --list (-t).
The --preserve option has no equivalent short option name. It is equivalent to --same-permissions plus --same-order.